£10 minimum deposit casinos in the UK for 2026: what the threshold actually buys

Updated September 2026

Licensed

Available in GB

Fast payouts

18+ Only

A £10 minimum deposit is the bread-and-crumb tier of UK online casinos — high enough that most mainstream brands accept it without a fuss, low enough that a casual bankroll can sit on it for a session or two. It is also a threshold whose meaning has changed. The Gambling Commission’s crackdown on bonus terms since 19 December 2025, with a 10x wagering cap, sits between the reader and a lot of the marketing they will meet, and what a £10 deposit buys now is not what it bought a few years ago.

This page works through what that looks like in practice. The legal frame first — a £10 minimum does not exempt a brand from licensing — then the responsible-gaming machinery that runs at every stake, then how deposits and withdrawals actually move, and only then the ten operators in the comparison. The arithmetic at the centre is a wagering band rather than a single number: given a bonus, a stake and a 10x cap, here is the floor and ceiling of what one reader can be asked to do before any winnings become theirs.

Data current as of 24 September 2026, verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register of gambling businesses.

The legal frame for any UK deposit, whatever the minimum

A £10 minimum is a marketing choice, not a licence. The threshold does not move a brand onto or off the Gambling Commission’s register, and it does not change which rules apply once a player has deposited. The same UKGC licence is required whether the minimum is £1 or £20; the same GAMSTOP check runs; the same identity verification gates the first deposit.

The two Acts that build this frame are the Gambling Act 2005 and the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014. The first set up the Commission and gave it powers over Great Britain — England, Scotland and Wales — and the second closed the offshore loophole that had let Malta- and Curaçao-licensed brands take UK customers without a Commission licence. Since 2014 any operator taking deposits from people in Great Britain needs a GB-issued licence, irrespective of where the company is incorporated. A Curaçao number on a casino’s footer is not a substitute; a Gibraltar licence is not a substitute. The Commission’s public register is the only test that matters, and it is searchable, downloadable as CSV or Excel, and updated as licence statuses change.

On 18 September 2026 the register listed 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence. That is the population a £10 minimum deposit site draws from — not because every one of those licensees runs a casino aimed at small-stake players, but because the threshold alone does not exempt any of them from the regime. The register’s domain list carries 1,065 active and 361 white-label entries on the same date; a white-label site trades under another company’s licence and should read as one brand to a player, not as an independent competitor. The Commission also publishes the remote casino licence numbers in a fixed format — six-digit account number, then -R-, then a sequence, then a suffix — so any page that publishes a licence line can be cross-checked against the register in seconds.

The practical upshot for a £10 deposit: the brand must hold a GB remote casino licence, must verify the player’s name, address and date of birth before the first deposit or any play, must enrol the player in GAMSTOP checks, and must offer the financial-limits and time-out tools that the social responsibility code requires. The minimum stake is a knob on the front door; the licence and everything that follows from it is the building.

What the £10 stack has to do to stay legal

A licensed UK casino has more obligations attached to a £10 deposit than a player tends to notice. The credit-card ban came in first: from 14 April 2020 no gambling deposit of any size in Great Britain may be funded by a credit card, including credit cards routed through an e-wallet. The Commission’s own estimate at the time was that around 800,000 UK consumers used credit cards to gamble in 2018, and that 22% of online gamblers who used credit cards to gamble fell into the problem-gambling group. Debit cards and bank transfers were never in the ban’s scope, which is why both still handle the bulk of small-deposit players.

Slot stake limits came next, on a moving schedule. From 9 April 2025 the maximum stake per game cycle for players aged 25 and over is £5; from 21 May 2025 the same cap is £2 for players aged 18 to 24. A game cycle is one spin end-to-end, and these are the figures that bound how far a £10 deposit actually carries on slots. A £2 stake and a £5 stake between them cover most casual play; anything above £5 on a UK slot is no longer offered. The session-pace rules came along earlier — no auto-play since 31 October 2021, no spin faster than 2.5 seconds, no “losses disguised as wins” animations — so a slot session is also a slower-feeling session than it was a few years ago.

Bonus terms have moved the furthest. From 19 December 2025 wagering requirements are capped at 10x the bonus amount, and mixed-product bonuses — bet on sport, receive casino spins — are banned outright. For a £10 deposit that means a £10 bonus cannot carry more than £100 of playthrough obligation, and the mixed-deal carrot that older pages will still describe has been pulled. The 10x cap is the figure the comparison below leans on, because it is the headline number a reader with a small bankroll will want to weigh before they accept a bonus at all.

Anonymous play is not an option. Operators must verify name, address and date of birth before the first deposit or any play, with the requirement back-dated to 7 May 2019. No offshore-style “deposit and play” still has a place at a GB-licensed casino, and any brand that offered it is by definition outside the regime covered here.

Responsible gambling at a £10 stake

The responsible-gambling machinery at a £10 minimum site is the same machinery that runs at every other stake — GAMSTOP, deposit-limit prompts, the financial vulnerability check — but the smaller deposit is the one where the player is most likely to drift past the trip-wires without noticing.

GAMSTOP is the national self-exclusion scheme, and it has been a mandatory condition of every online licence since 31 March 2020. A player who registers excludes themselves from every GB-licensed operator at once — not from one brand, not from one product, from all of them. Exclusion periods run to six months, one year or five years and cannot be cancelled early; that irreversibility is the point. The gambling register is paired with the multi-operator self-exclusion scheme at the front of the player’s account, so an excluded player cannot open a new account at any of the brands below while an exclusion is live. GAMSTOP is also free; schemes that charge for equivalent cover sit outside it and are not bound by it.

Deposit limits have to be offered before the first deposit goes in — from 31 October 2025 a customer must be prompted to set a financial limit, though the limit itself is whatever the player chooses, including nothing at all. The state does not impose a ceiling on deposits or losses; the prompt is the only mandatory check. The same prompt can be re-run at any time, and any limit set on a £10 deposit also acts on deposits of £50 and £100 on the same account. The player who never sees the prompt has used a brand that is not GB-licensed.

A second check sits higher up the spend curve. From 28 February 2025 a financial vulnerability check kicks in at £150 in net deposits across a rolling 30-day window, drawing on public-data sources only. It is the marker the Commission uses for a player whose deposit pattern has begun to drift; the wider financial risk assessments the Commission has announced are not in force yet. For a £10-only player this is a far-off trip-wire. For a player who escalates from £10 to a few sessions of £50, it is the second thing to hit after the deposit-limit prompt.

Reality checks and time-outs are the everyday layer. A reality check interrupts a session at intervals and reports time spent and money laid out; a time-out is a short self-exclusion on one account. Neither requires GAMSTOP and neither shows up on the public register. They are the tools a £10-stake player should know about, because they are the ones a casual session can grow into.

The recourse layer is the last piece. The Commission’s complaints route reaches a licensed operator at all; an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) body approved by the Commission is the escalation step. GamCare runs the National Gambling Helpline, and GambleAware funds treatment and education across Great Britain. None of these are recourses for a player on an unlicensed site; that is the practical force of the licence — it is what gives the player somewhere to go when the operator does not respond.

The shorter version: GAMSTOP enrolls you out of every GB-licensed site at once; deposit-limit prompts gate every first deposit; vulnerability checks trip at £150 of net deposits over 30 days; the ADR route escalates when the operator does not fix what you reported. A site that skips any of these sits outside the regime, with nothing to fall back on.

How a £10 deposit moves, and how the winnings come back

A small deposit does not move faster or slower than a large one. The Faster Payments Service that handles UK bank transfers runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week; most payments arrive instantly or within a couple of minutes, with the occasional transfer taking up to two hours. The scheme carries a £1,000,000 per-transaction limit and the Bank of England oversees the system’s safety and stability while providing final settlement — none of which a £10 deposit will brush against, but the rails a £10 deposit uses are the same rails a £1,000 transfer uses. Card payments work in the same envelope; the credit-card ban covers them out, but a Visa or Mastercard debit deposit is still instant-and-there in the typical card-handling case.

Apple Pay is also a route at some brands, where the casino has accepted it as a deposit option. Apple launched the wallet on 20 October 2014 supporting only US-issued cards, then began accepting UK cards on 14 July 2015, so the local infrastructure has been in place for a decade. The technology is built around tokenization: the actual card number is replaced by a device-specific tokenised Device Primary Account Number and a dynamic security code is generated for each transaction. Authentication on an iPhone with Face ID is a double-click of the side button; on Touch ID models, a double-click of the Home button — both confirmed against biometric data tied to the device. The wallet’s marketing caveat, repeated on Apple’s own support page, is that a supported card from a participating issuer is required and Apple Pay is not available in all markets. For UK gamblers the practical picture is that the wallet shows up as a deposit option at a handful of brands, where a £10 deposit can ride on it as readily as on a card.

A digital-wallet second tier also exists. AstroPay, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Uruguay, operates as a global digital wallet offering online payments, virtual and physical debit cards, and peer-to-peer transfers. The company’s UK entity, Larstal Limited, is an electronic money institution authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011; the Isle of Man entity, AstroPay Global (IOM) Limited, is licensed by the Isle of Man Financial Services Authority for money transmission; the Danish entity, Larstal Denmark ApS, is authorised as an electronic money institution by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority; and the Brazilian entity, Astro Instituição de Pagamento Ltda, is authorised by the Brazilian Central Bank as an electronic currency issuer. The wallet serves users across markets including the UK. The regulatory framing matters here because it is the layering that lets a UK-facing deposit ride through a non-bank provider without losing Consumer-side protections.

Withdrawals are the slower channel, and they do not accelerate for a smaller deposit. A withdrawal back to a debit card passes through the issuing bank’s standard settlement window — often one to three working days, sometimes faster for banks that have pushed their internal rails into instant territory. A withdrawal back via Faster Payments lands within minutes at most UK banks, subject to the operator’s own pending period. E-wallet withdrawals are typically the fastest, where the e-wallet in question is supported for payouts and not just for deposits. The credit-card ban doesn’t reverse on the way out: a withdrawal cannot be sent to a credit card at a GB-licensed operator, full stop.

The picture that emerges: deposits are essentially instantaneous for the methods any £10-stake player will use. Withdrawals are faster the closer they stay on the Faster Payments rail, slower on the card-rail, and bounded above by what the bank — not the casino — will do.

The £10 deposit in the bonus era

A £10 deposit has historically been the deposit a casino would match, double, or triple as an entry-point bonus. That marketing template still exists, but the math behind it has been re-set.

From 19 December 2025 wagering requirements are capped at 10x the bonus amount. A £10 bonus therefore cannot carry more than £100 of playthrough obligation; a £20 bonus cannot carry more than £200; a £5 bonus cannot carry more than £50. Mixed-product bonuses — the classic “bet £10 on sport, get 20 free spins” — are banned, so the cross-product carrot has gone. What remains is straightforward: a casino bonus at this stake is paid in casino-only credit, with a single wagering multiple that the Commission has set against the marketing instinct to bury a 30x or 40x requirement in the small print. The cap is the floor and ceiling of what a player may be asked to do.

The arithmetic that matters to a £10 player is the play-through band. Take the worst case under the cap — a £10 bonus with a 10x playthrough — and a £0.10 stake per spin on a 96%-RTP slot. The turnover required is £10 × 10 = £100 of qualifying play. At a £0.10 stake that is 1,000 spins. A spin takes 2.5 seconds under the Commission’s game-speed rule, so 1,000 × 2.5 = 2,500 seconds, or roughly 42 minutes of uninterrupted slot time. The expected loss, given a 96% return, is £100 × (1 − 0.96) = £4 — an estimate, not a guarantee, and the same caveats that apply to any statistical readout apply here. That is the ceiling: at the very top of the allowed bonus terms, a £10 deposit exposes a player to roughly 42 minutes of slot play and an expected £4 of theoretical loss.

The floor is much lower. A “deposit match” bonus at the same £10 deposit might carry a 5x playthrough on the bonus only — £50 of qualifying play, 500 spins at £0.10, roughly 21 minutes of slot time and an expected £2 of theoretical loss. Many modern £10-deposit offers carry no bonus at all, which removes the playthrough obligation entirely and leaves the player with their £10 balance to play through as they choose. The Commission has not banned bonuses — only capped them — and the market has tilted toward the deposit-and-play model where the bonus would have to be unusually generous to be worth the conditions that ride on it.

A rough rule for a £10-deposit player: ignore the headline “up to” figure on a welcome bonus unless the wagering multiple is stated beside it. If the multiple is 10x or under, the offer is legal and the calculation above applies. If the multiple reads as “30x” or higher, the offer predates 19 December 2025 and the operator is either non-compliant or describing a non-bonus promotion. Either way, the safer path is to deposit and play through the balance without the bonus, accepting that the marketing incentive is rarely priced in the player’s favour at this stake.

The licensed UK operators compared

The ten operators below all hold an active remote casino operating licence on the Gambling Commission’s public register as of 18 September 2026. Each operator’s licence line is reproduced in the table in the form the register uses — six-digit account number, -R-, sequence, suffix — so any reader can cross-check it. Domains are the URL the register lists against that licence account.

What the table is not. It is not a ranking, and it does not rank operators by payout speed, welcome bonus or game depth because the research inputs do not carry that ordering for this set. Where a column would be empty across most rows, the column has been dropped; where the figure is missing for one row, the row carries the em-dash marker. The comparison is licence-and-domain only, because that is the data the public register carries for every entry here.

Several brands can and do sit under one licensee. Ladbrokes, Coral and Gala Bingo all hold licences from LC International Limited, and a player looking at three brands may be looking at one operating company. The register is the only place this distinction is published cleanly; the casino sites themselves rarely volunteer it. The status column uses the register’s three states — Active, Inactive, White Label — and every domain listed above is Active on the snapshot date.

What the licence line buys the player

The licence line is a route map rather than a guarantee. It tells the player who the registered operator is (the licence holder named in column two), what licence they hold (the full remote casino operating licence number), and what domain sits on that licence. A player who has a dispute with a brand has to pursue it through the licence holder named on the register, not through whichever brand name the marketing lands them at. A player who wants to check that the brand is allowed to take UK deposits pulls the register entry, confirms the licence is Active, and proceeds.

The white-label entry deserves its own note. A white-label website runs under another operator’s licence; the operator’s own compliance and complaints procedures apply, but the website is owned and run by a third party. On 18 September 2026 the register carried 361 such entries, compared with 1,065 Active entries. A player checking a brand against the register who finds a white-label entry and not an Active one should think of it as licensed under someone else’s licence, not as unlicensed — but the responsibility for the player relationship still runs back to the named licence holder.

What the register does not cover

The register is silent on the things most comparisons try to rank: payout speed, game library depth, welcome bonus generosity, customer-service quality, mobile-app polish. None of those is on the public register because none is the regulator’s job to test. The Commission’s role is to license the operator and to enforce the social responsibility code, the LCCP and the Remote Technical Standards — the things that determine whether an operator is allowed to take UK deposits at all. Everything downstream of that is operator-on-its-own-merits.

A player comparing brands on anything other than the licence line has to use the operators’ own published terms, independent review sites, or hands-on testing. None of those is what the table below is for. The table says the ten operators listed are licensed; it does not say which of them is best, fastest or most generous. That is a different comparison and a different set of inputs.

How to read this list as a player

The honest reading of the ten rows above is that any of them can take a £10 deposit, and that any of them has already done the regulatory work the Commission requires. The differences come from what each operator does with the licence, and that is where a player has to do their own reading.

Bet365 (Hillside UK Gaming ENC) sits in the four-figure licence-number range (055149-R-331499-004) and is one of the largest operators by deposit volume in the UK. The licence has been active long enough that its renewal cycle is well within the operator’s institutional discipline. For a player who values the breadth of an established product over novelty, the brand’s track record carries weight — though “track record” is here the operative phrase, because the figures that drive the product are not in this page.

Betfair (PPB Games Limited, 039411-R-319335-010) and PokerStars (Stars Interactive Limited, 039108-R-319334-026) are exchange-and-poker-first operators that have built casino verticals around their core customer base. A player who already has an account with either brand for sports betting or poker will find the casino wallet already in place; a player who doesn’t may find the casino lobby smaller than a casino-first operator’s. The same caveat on published figures applies.

Betfred (Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited, 039544-R-319290-010), Coral (LC International Limited, 054743-R-330863-014) and Unibet (Platinum Gaming Limited, 045322-R-324275-019) are high-street-and-online hybrids, with a UK retail footprint that gives them an enduring presence in the GB market. The Gibraltar incorporation on the Betfred licence is a reminder of the 2014 Act’s effect: the licence is GB-issued even though the holder is Gibraltar-domiciled, and the GB regime applies in full.

Casumo (Recro Limited, 061549-R-336718-002) and 888casino (888 UK Limited, 039028-R-319297-014) are casino-first operators with licences long past their first renewal cycle. The lower six-digit account numbers on both reflect the older part of the register’s numbering.

kwiff (Eaton Gate Gaming Limited, 044448-R-323408-017) and Midnite (Dribble Media Limited, 042647-R-321653-022) are the newer entrants by licence date. Both are GB-licensed and both have active domains, but a player new to either brand is dealing with a younger operating history. That is not a flaw — it is information the register carries, because the licence number alone tells a player when the operator passed the latest fit-and-proper test.

The shared-licence point bears repeating because it shapes the comparison. Coral, Ladbrokes and Gala Bingo all run under LC International Limited; treating them as three competitors on the licence front is to misread what the register says. The brand the player sees is the marketing front; the company that holds the licence is what the regulator sees. This is the kind of distinction a small-deposit player rarely has to think about, but it determines who the player’s complaint actually reaches.

The single applicable point across all ten is the responsible-gambling infrastructure. GAMSTOP runs on every brand; the deposit-limit prompt runs on every brand; the financial vulnerability check at £150 of net deposits over 30 days runs on every brand; and every brand’s ADR route is approved by the Commission. The player’s recourse is the same on every row of the table, and is the single reason a £10 minimum deposit casino at a GB-licensed operator is a different proposition from the same word on a non-licensed site.

What the player cannot check from the table

A note on what is missing, in case the table’s brevity is read as a guarantee. The register does not publish a payout-speed ranking, a game-count ranking or any welcome-bonus terms. None of those is a regulatory matter, and none is on the public register. A player who has narrowed the field to two or three brands from this list — which is what the table is designed to enable — has to verify product-level questions on each brand’s own terms page, ideally with a recent hands-on review.

What the register does say is that all ten operators are currently allowed to take deposits from people in Great Britain. None of them is on a list of suspended or revoked licences, and none has been the subject of a public regulatory action severe enough to put it on the Commission’s enforcement notices in a way that would lift an Active status. The Commission does publish enforcement actions separately; an Active licence line is not a clean bill of health, only a current permission to operate.

A second note: the subject-support column in the table reads as a dash across every row. The research inputs carry no brand-specific data on which operators offer a £10 minimum deposit specifically — many do, because £10 is the modal mainstream-deposit threshold, but the snapshot the inputs reach does not lock that to a specific brand. The reader should treat the £10-deposit acceptance as a market fact rather than a per-brand feature, and verify on each brand’s banking page before depositing.

Tax, duty and what a £10 win means on the player’s side

UK players pay no tax on gambling winnings. Remote Gaming Duty is paid by operators — the levy was 21% for many years, raised to 40% from 1 April 2026 — but that is the operator’s liability, settled with HMRC, and does not touch the player’s payout. A £10 deposit that turns into a £200 withdrawal is paid in full to the player, and the operator settles its duty separately.

This is one of the cleaner points of the UK regime compared with several neighbouring jurisdictions. A player who has won and is about to withdraw does not need to ring-fence a tax slice, and the operator cannot withhold one. The relevant questions for the player are the Commission’s identity-verification and source-of-funds requirements, which are the only reasons a withdrawal can be delayed or declined.

The flip side is that the operator’s duty cost is part of why the bonus economics at a small deposit are what they are. A 40% Remote Gaming Duty sits behind every pound of GGY the operator counts, and the bonus headline that lands on a £10 deposit has already priced that in. This is not a reason to refuse a bonus — it is a reason to weigh the bonus’s actual cost against the alternative of depositing and playing through the balance.

The unlicensed edge, and why it sits outside this list

A £10 minimum deposit casino that is not on GAMSTOP is, by definition, not GB-licensed. The Commission has been explicit since 31 March 2020 that GAMSTOP is a mandatory condition of every online licence. A site that advertises itself as accepting UK players but does not appear on the Commission’s public register is operating outside Great Britain’s licensing regime, and offering gambling to people in Great Britain without a licence is an offence under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005.

The Commission’s enforcement toolkit does not extend to blocking ISPs. What it does have is the power to issue cease-and-desist notices, to push for search-engine delisting, and to refer payment processors and hosting providers into compliance. The penalty is aimed at the operator, not the player — but the player loses on protection, not on fines. An unlicensed site offers no GAMSTOP enrollment, no Commission complaints route, no approved ADR, and no financial vulnerability check. The “no ID check” promise that some unlicensed sites use as a marketing point is not a perk; it is the absence of every safeguard the GB regime has built into the deposit-and-play step.

There are also tax-side reasons an unlicensed site is rarely worth a player heading off-piste for. The headline “no verification” pitch skips the very check that allows a Commission-regulated operator to release withdrawals cleanly — a player who wins on an unlicensed site and then has to prove their identity and source of funds for a withdrawal has lost the very advantage they were promised. The short version: a £10-deposit casino without a Gambling Commission licence is not a parallel option. It is a different regime, with the player on the wrong side of it.

The bottom line on a £10 deposit

A £10 deposit at a GB-licensed casino in 2026 buys a stack that is real, regulated and slower-moving than the £10 deposit of five years ago. The slot stake caps make a difference on a small balance — £2 per spin for a player aged 18 to 24, £5 for anyone aged 25 and over — and the 10x wagering cap on bonuses resets the arithmetic a player runs in their head on a bonus offer. The math at the centre of the page — £10 bonus × 10x = £100 turnover; £100 ÷ £0.10 stake = 1,000 spins; 1,000 × 2.5 seconds = 42 minutes; £100 × 0.04 = £4 expected loss — is the ceiling a £10 player can face, and the floor sits much lower at offers with no bonus or a smaller playthrough.

The ten operators on the register are different products behind the same regulatory front door. The table does not pick between them; the comparison a player reads on product features has to come from a different source. What the register does say — that each of them is allowed to take UK deposits and that each is bound by the responsible-gambling machinery at every stake — is the part that is comparable across the ten.

The closing rule is the same rule the section started with: read the licence line before the welcome bonus. A 30x or 40x wagering requirement is not 2026; the 10x cap is. A site that does not appear on the register is not the same offer with a different name; it is a different regime.

Frequently asked questions

What counts as a £10 minimum deposit at a licensed UK casino?

It means the operator allows a first deposit of exactly £10 through at least one mainstream payment method — typically Visa or Mastercard debit, bank transfer via Faster Payments, or an e-wallet such as Apple Pay where supported. The £10 threshold does not change the licence, the ID check, or the GAMSTOP enrollment that gate the first deposit.

Is a £10 minimum deposit casino safe to use?

Safe in the regulatory sense, yes, if the brand holds an active remote casino operating licence on the Gambling Commission’s public register. Safety in that frame covers ID verification, segregation of player funds, GAMSTOP enrollment, ADR escalation, and the operator’s own duty to report suspicious activity — not the outcomes of any individual session.

Can I find a £10 minimum deposit casino that isn’t on GAMSTOP?

No, not among GB-licensed operators. GAMSTOP has been a mandatory condition of every online licence since 31 March 2020. A site that advertises £10 deposits, accepts UK players and is not on GAMSTOP is unlicensed, and operating outside the regime covered in this article.

How quickly do withdrawals settle after a £10 deposit?

Withdrawals back to a UK bank account via Faster Payments typically arrive within minutes at most banks, with occasional delays of up to two hours. Withdrawals to a debit card typically take one to three working days. E-wallet withdrawals vary; the e-wallet needs to support payouts, not just deposits.

Which payment methods accept a £10 minimum deposit?

At mainstream GB-licensed casinos, debit cards (Visa, Mastercard), bank transfer via the Faster Payments Service, and a narrower set of e-wallets such as Apple Pay (where the brand supports it) and AstroPay. Credit cards are banned for gambling in Great Britain as of 14 April 2020, including credit cards routed through e-wallets.

Is a £10 minimum deposit casino licensed by the Gambling Commission?

Not necessarily — the £10 figure is a marketing threshold, not a regulatory one. Any operator taking deposits from people in Great Britain must hold a GB remote casino operating licence, regardless of the minimum. The Commission’s public register is the only place to verify that a brand does.

Written by the editors at slotstudiosguide.